{"resultsPerPage":1,"startIndex":0,"totalResults":1,"format":"NVD_CVE","version":"2.0","timestamp":"2026-04-30T18:53:34.944","vulnerabilities":[{"cve":{"id":"CVE-2025-71181","sourceIdentifier":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67","published":"2026-01-31T12:16:03.353","lastModified":"2026-03-25T19:43:46.447","vulnStatus":"Analyzed","cveTags":[],"descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nrust_binder: remove spin_lock() in rust_shrink_free_page()\n\nWhen forward-porting Rust Binder to 6.18, I neglected to take commit\nfb56fdf8b9a2 (\"mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope\") into\naccount, and apparently I did not end up running the shrinker callback\nwhen I sanity tested the driver before submission. This leads to crashes\nlike the following:\n\n\t============================================\n\tWARNING: possible recursive locking detected\n\t6.18.0-mainline-maybe-dirty #1 Tainted: G          IO\n\t--------------------------------------------\n\tkswapd0/68 is trying to acquire lock:\n\tffff956000fa18b0 (&l->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: lock_list_lru_of_memcg+0x128/0x230\n\n\tbut task is already holding lock:\n\tffff956000fa18b0 (&l->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: rust_helper_spin_lock+0xd/0x20\n\n\tother info that might help us debug this:\n\t Possible unsafe locking scenario:\n\n\t       CPU0\n\t       ----\n\t  lock(&l->lock);\n\t  lock(&l->lock);\n\n\t *** DEADLOCK ***\n\n\t May be due to missing lock nesting notation\n\n\t3 locks held by kswapd0/68:\n\t #0: ffffffff90d2e260 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kswapd+0x597/0x1160\n\t #1: ffff956000fa18b0 (&l->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: rust_helper_spin_lock+0xd/0x20\n\t #2: ffffffff90cf3680 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: lock_list_lru_of_memcg+0x2d/0x230\n\nTo fix this, remove the spin_lock() call from rust_shrink_free_page()."},{"lang":"es","value":"En el kernel de Linux, la siguiente vulnerabilidad ha sido resuelta:\n\nrust_binder: eliminar spin_lock() en rust_shrink_free_page()\n\nAl portar Rust Binder a la versión 6.18, descuidé tener en cuenta el commit fb56fdf8b9a2 ('mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope'), y aparentemente no terminé ejecutando la devolución de llamada del reductor cuando probé la cordura del controlador antes de la entrega. Esto lleva a fallos como el siguiente:\n\n\t============================================\n\tADVERTENCIA: posible bloqueo recursivo detectado\n\t6.18.0-mainline-maybe-dirty #1 Tainted: G          IO\n\t--------------------------------------------\n\tkswapd0/68 está intentando adquirir el bloqueo:\n\tffff956000fa18b0 (&l->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, en: lock_list_lru_of_memcg+0x128/0x230\n\n\tpero la tarea ya está manteniendo el bloqueo:\n\tffff956000fa18b0 (&l->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, en: rust_helper_spin_lock+0xd/0x20\n\n\totra información que podría ayudarnos a depurar esto:\n\t Posible escenario de bloqueo inseguro:\n\n\t       CPU0\n\t       ----\n\t  lock(&l->lock);\n\t  lock(&l->lock);\n\n\t * INTERBLOQUEO *\n\n\t Puede deberse a la falta de notación de anidamiento de bloqueo\n\n\t3 bloqueos mantenidos por kswapd0/68:\n\t #0: ffffffff90d2e260 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, en: kswapd+0x597/0x1160\n\t #1: ffff956000fa18b0 (&l->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, en: rust_helper_spin_lock+0xd/0x20\n\t #2: ffffffff90cf3680 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, en: lock_list_lru_of_memcg+0x2d/0x230\n\nPara solucionar esto, elimine la llamada a spin_lock() de rust_shrink_free_page()."}],"metrics":{"cvssMetricV31":[{"source":"nvd@nist.gov","type":"Primary","cvssData":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","baseScore":5.5,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","attackVector":"LOCAL","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"LOW","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"HIGH"},"exploitabilityScore":1.8,"impactScore":3.6}]},"weaknesses":[{"source":"nvd@nist.gov","type":"Primary","description":[{"lang":"en","value":"CWE-667"}]}],"configurations":[{"nodes":[{"operator":"OR","negate":false,"cpeMatch":[{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","versionStartIncluding":"6.18.1","versionEndExcluding":"6.18.6","matchCriteriaId":"244757F1-F957-45E1-ADDD-D008246BCF53"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.18:-:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"DCE57113-2223-4308-A0F2-5E6ECFBB3C23"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.19:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"17B67AA7-40D6-4AFA-8459-F200F3D7CFD1"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.19:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"C47E4CC9-C826-4FA9-B014-7FE3D9B318B2"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.19:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"F71D92C0-C023-48BD-B3B6-70B638EEE298"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.19:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"13580667-0A98-40CC-B29F-D12790B91BDB"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.19:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"CAD1FED7-CF48-47BF-AC7D-7B6FA3C065FC"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.19:rc6:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"3EF854A1-ABB1-4E93-BE9A-44569EC76C0D"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.19:rc7:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"F5DC0CA6-F0AF-4DDF-A882-3DADB9A886A7"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.19:rc8:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"EB5B7DFC-C36B-45D8-922C-877569FDDF43"}]}]}],"references":[{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/30a98c97f7874031f2e1de19c777ce011143cba4","source":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67","tags":["Patch"]},{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/361e0ff456a8daf9753c18030533256e4133ce7a","source":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67","tags":["Patch"]}]}}]}