{"resultsPerPage":1,"startIndex":0,"totalResults":1,"format":"NVD_CVE","version":"2.0","timestamp":"2026-05-09T13:44:47.605","vulnerabilities":[{"cve":{"id":"CVE-2024-26725","sourceIdentifier":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67","published":"2024-04-03T15:15:54.257","lastModified":"2025-01-07T17:28:15.293","vulnStatus":"Analyzed","cveTags":[],"descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndpll: fix possible deadlock during netlink dump operation\n\nRecently, I've been hitting following deadlock warning during dpll pin\ndump:\n\n[52804.637962] ======================================================\n[52804.638536] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected\n[52804.639111] 6.8.0-rc2jiri+ #1 Not tainted\n[52804.639529] ------------------------------------------------------\n[52804.640104] python3/2984 is trying to acquire lock:\n[52804.640581] ffff88810e642678 (nlk_cb_mutex-GENERIC){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: netlink_dump+0xb3/0x780\n[52804.641417]\n               but task is already holding lock:\n[52804.642010] ffffffff83bde4c8 (dpll_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dpll_lock_dumpit+0x13/0x20\n[52804.642747]\n               which lock already depends on the new lock.\n\n[52804.643551]\n               the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:\n[52804.644259]\n               -> #1 (dpll_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:\n[52804.644836]        lock_acquire+0x174/0x3e0\n[52804.645271]        __mutex_lock+0x119/0x1150\n[52804.645723]        dpll_lock_dumpit+0x13/0x20\n[52804.646169]        genl_start+0x266/0x320\n[52804.646578]        __netlink_dump_start+0x321/0x450\n[52804.647056]        genl_family_rcv_msg_dumpit+0x155/0x1e0\n[52804.647575]        genl_rcv_msg+0x1ed/0x3b0\n[52804.648001]        netlink_rcv_skb+0xdc/0x210\n[52804.648440]        genl_rcv+0x24/0x40\n[52804.648831]        netlink_unicast+0x2f1/0x490\n[52804.649290]        netlink_sendmsg+0x36d/0x660\n[52804.649742]        __sock_sendmsg+0x73/0xc0\n[52804.650165]        __sys_sendto+0x184/0x210\n[52804.650597]        __x64_sys_sendto+0x72/0x80\n[52804.651045]        do_syscall_64+0x6f/0x140\n[52804.651474]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e\n[52804.652001]\n               -> #0 (nlk_cb_mutex-GENERIC){+.+.}-{3:3}:\n[52804.652650]        check_prev_add+0x1ae/0x1280\n[52804.653107]        __lock_acquire+0x1ed3/0x29a0\n[52804.653559]        lock_acquire+0x174/0x3e0\n[52804.653984]        __mutex_lock+0x119/0x1150\n[52804.654423]        netlink_dump+0xb3/0x780\n[52804.654845]        __netlink_dump_start+0x389/0x450\n[52804.655321]        genl_family_rcv_msg_dumpit+0x155/0x1e0\n[52804.655842]        genl_rcv_msg+0x1ed/0x3b0\n[52804.656272]        netlink_rcv_skb+0xdc/0x210\n[52804.656721]        genl_rcv+0x24/0x40\n[52804.657119]        netlink_unicast+0x2f1/0x490\n[52804.657570]        netlink_sendmsg+0x36d/0x660\n[52804.658022]        __sock_sendmsg+0x73/0xc0\n[52804.658450]        __sys_sendto+0x184/0x210\n[52804.658877]        __x64_sys_sendto+0x72/0x80\n[52804.659322]        do_syscall_64+0x6f/0x140\n[52804.659752]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e\n[52804.660281]\n               other info that might help us debug this:\n\n[52804.661077]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:\n\n[52804.661671]        CPU0                    CPU1\n[52804.662129]        ----                    ----\n[52804.662577]   lock(dpll_lock);\n[52804.662924]                                lock(nlk_cb_mutex-GENERIC);\n[52804.663538]                                lock(dpll_lock);\n[52804.664073]   lock(nlk_cb_mutex-GENERIC);\n[52804.664490]\n\nThe issue as follows: __netlink_dump_start() calls control->start(cb)\nwith nlk->cb_mutex held. In control->start(cb) the dpll_lock is taken.\nThen nlk->cb_mutex is released and taken again in netlink_dump(), while\ndpll_lock still being held. That leads to ABBA deadlock when another\nCPU races with the same operation.\n\nFix this by moving dpll_lock taking into dumpit() callback which ensures\ncorrect lock taking order."},{"lang":"es","value":"En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: dpll: soluciona un posible punto muerto durante la operación de volcado de netlink Recientemente, he estado recibiendo la siguiente advertencia de punto muerto durante el volcado de pin de dpll: [52804.637962] =========== =========================================== [52804.638536] ADVERTENCIA: posible circular dependencia de bloqueo detectada [52804.639111] 6.8.0-rc2jiri+ #1 No contaminado [52804.639529] -------------------------------- ---------------------- [52804.640104] python3/2984 está intentando adquirir el bloqueo: [52804.640581] ffff88810e642678 (nlk_cb_mutex-GENERIC){+.+.}- {3:3}, en: netlink_dump+0xb3/0x780 [52804.641417] pero la tarea ya mantiene el bloqueo: [52804.642010] ffffffff83bde4c8 (dpll_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, en: dpll_lock_dumpit+0x13/0x20 [52804.642747] qué bloqueo ya depende del nuevo bloqueo. [52804.643551] la cadena de dependencia existente (en orden inverso) es: [52804.644259] -> #1 (dpll_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [52804.644836] lock_acquire+0x174/0x3e0 [52804.645271] __mutex_lock+ 0x119/0x1150 [52804.645723] dpll_lock_dumpit+0x13/0x20 [52804.646169] genl_start+0x266/0x320 [52804.646578] __netlink_dump_start+0x321/0x450 [52804.647056 ] genl_family_rcv_msg_dumpit+0x155/0x1e0 [52804.647575] genl_rcv_msg+0x1ed/0x3b0 [52804.648001] netlink_rcv_skb+0xdc/ 0x210 [52804.648440] genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 [52804.648831] netlink_unicast+0x2f1/0x490 [52804.649290] netlink_sendmsg+0x36d/0x660 [52804.649742] __sock_sendmsg +0x73/0xc0 [52804.650165] __sys_sendto+0x184/0x210 [52804.650597] __x64_sys_sendto+0x72/0x80 [ 52804.651045] do_syscall_64+0x6f/0x140 [52804.651474] Entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e [52804.652001] -> #0 (nlk_cb_mutex-GENERIC){+.+.}-{3:3}: [52804.6 52650] check_prev_add+0x1ae/0x1280 [52804.653107 ] __lock_acquire+0x1ed3/0x29a0 [52804.653559] lock_acquire+0x174/0x3e0 [52804.653984] __mutex_lock+0x119/0x1150 [52804.654423] netlink_dump+0xb3/0x780 [52804.654 845] __netlink_dump_start+0x389/0x450 [52804.655321] genl_family_rcv_msg_dumpit+0x155/0x1e0 [52804.655842] genl_rcv_msg +0x1ed/0x3b0 [52804.656272] netlink_rcv_skb+0xdc/0x210 [52804.656721] genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 [52804.657119] netlink_unicast+0x2f1/0x490 [52804.657570] netlink_sendm sg+0x36d/0x660 [52804.658022] __sock_sendmsg+0x73/0xc0 [52804.658450] __sys_sendto+0x184 /0x210 [52804.658877] __x64_sys_sendto+0x72/0x80 [52804.659322] do_syscall_64+0x6f/0x140 [52804.659752] Entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e [52804.66 0281] otra información que podría ayudarnos a depurar esto: [52804.661077] Posible escenario de bloqueo inseguro: [52804.661671] CPU0 CPU1 [52804.662129] ---- ---- [52804.662577] bloqueo(dpll_lock); [52804.662924] bloqueo (nlk_cb_mutex-GENERIC); [52804.663538] bloqueo(dpll_lock); [52804.664073] bloqueo (nlk_cb_mutex-GENERIC); [52804.664490] El problema es el siguiente: __netlink_dump_start() llama a control->start(cb) con nlk->cb_mutex retenido. En control->start(cb) se toma dpll_lock. Luego, nlk->cb_mutex se libera y se toma nuevamente en netlink_dump(), mientras dpll_lock aún se mantiene. Eso lleva a un punto muerto de ABBA cuando otra CPU corre con la misma operación. Solucione este problema moviendo dpll_lock a la devolución de llamada dumpit(), lo que garantiza el orden correcto de toma de bloqueo."}],"metrics":{"cvssMetricV31":[{"source":"nvd@nist.gov","type":"Primary","cvssData":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","baseScore":5.5,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","attackVector":"LOCAL","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"LOW","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"HIGH"},"exploitabilityScore":1.8,"impactScore":3.6}]},"weaknesses":[{"source":"nvd@nist.gov","type":"Primary","description":[{"lang":"en","value":"CWE-667"}]}],"configurations":[{"nodes":[{"operator":"OR","negate":false,"cpeMatch":[{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","versionStartIncluding":"6.7","versionEndExcluding":"6.7.6","matchCriteriaId":"C6D6A5C8-7308-42A9-8A72-ABF3DEA4BB82"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.8:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"B9F4EA73-0894-400F-A490-3A397AB7A517"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.8:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"056BD938-0A27-4569-B391-30578B309EE3"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.8:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"F02056A5-B362-4370-9FF8-6F0BD384D520"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.8:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"62075ACE-B2A0-4B16-829D-B3DA5AE5CC41"}]}]}],"references":[{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/087739cbd0d0b87b6cec2c0799436ac66e24acc8","source":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67","tags":["Patch"]},{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/53c0441dd2c44ee93fddb5473885fd41e4bc2361","source":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67","tags":["Patch"]},{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/087739cbd0d0b87b6cec2c0799436ac66e24acc8","source":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":["Patch"]},{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/53c0441dd2c44ee93fddb5473885fd41e4bc2361","source":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":["Patch"]}]}}]}